Best Practice |
View All View Faculty View Staff Faculty Extras Home |
||
|
Teaching online: Insights into eLearningAs more and more faculty consider developing courses for delivery online, PDWS Technique explores some considerations:
Of the terms denoting courses or degrees offered online through the internet, eLearning is gaining in popular usage. An increasing number of universities and colleges have implemented e-learning delivery systems for courses and entire degree programs. As of July 31, 2003, the Florida Distance Learning Consortium reported 1,188 credit courses offered through the internet by state funded colleges and universities. Offerings are varied throughout the state with HCC listing 24 courses, while across the bay St. Pete College boasts 203. Down south, Miami-Dade offers 52, to the north Tallahassee proffers 69, and HCC neighbor Pasco-Hernando Community College lists 9 internet courses. During the 2000 school year the course management system, WebCT accounted for usage by 5,100,000 students in 123,000 courses, developed by 33,000 university and college faculty at 1,100 institutions in 48 countries Keegan, 2002). The increase in the attractiveness of offering e-learning courses is in part attributed to declining enrollments and rising costs of traditional educational delivery (Small & Lohrasbi, 2003). Colleges and universities are recruiting new target populations, particularly working adults. For adult students, with a need to balance multiple roles and responsibilities, e-learning is a time-saving and flexible mode of receiving instruction. Younger, traditional age students that must be employed to pay for their education, find e-learning beneficial in their quest to efficiently allocate time and resources. Despite the positive aspects of elearning, there are still major concerns about its appropriateness and effectiveness. Although currently there are many strands of ongoing research, a universal standard for online teaching and learning has not been developed. Additionally, high student dropout rates are a concern. Frankola (2001) reports that dropout rates may be 10 to 20 percent higher for online courses and programs. Finally, there are times and contexts when traditional classroom or face-to-face learning is more appropriate than online delivery of instruction. elearning may not be an effective mode of learning for some students. However, the end goal is not to utilize e-learning for the sake of keeping up with the technology Joneses, but to enhance or widen the educational experience for students. Research on student perspectives concerning eLearning suggests that
Research on faculty perspectives across the nation include the following:
Who is the primary student population or group?Gathering information about students in the class is valuable in designing the course structure and scope. Adult students are usually more self-motivated than younger students, having specific goals and career needs. Information may be collected in the following ways:
Use the information garnered to place students in pairs or small groups containing people who have varied backgrounds and experiences. This is a workplace model that students will most likely encounter sometime on the job. What should the students learn?Identify clear objectives and learning outcomes. Having specific objectives is not different than in a traditional course, however, the objectives may or may not be the same. For instance, in an e-learning course, an objective may be to enhance the students ability to identify and utilize on-line resources, or to work effectively in groups outside the school environment. Set attainable goals for students, and use benchmarks to measure growth. State minimum participation requirements up front. Reveal what each learning activity is worth in points and the point system for grade attainment. How will the course be delivered?Consider what types of learning activities are needed so students can accomplish the identified learning objectives.
What resources are needed for student success?
A major aspect of eLearning is the relative independence of the learning experience. Although communication tools and collaborative projects can alleviate the isolationism of online courses, it is acknowledged that there is a huge difference between the traditional class and online class. A plus exists, however. Expecting students to be self-motivated and self-directed facilitates their ability to continue life-long learning pursuits. One strategy instructors find useful is to ask students to create and share calendars or learning contracts identifying when and how they will plan and schedule course learning activities (Hanna, Glowacki-Dudka, & Conceicao-Runlee, 2000). Developing a schedule for their learning also helps students acquire effective time management skills. References: Frankola, V. (2001). Why online learners drop out. Workforce, 80(10), 52-60. Hanna, D., Glowacki-Dudka, M., & Conceicao-Runlee, S. (2000). 147 Practical Tips For Teaching Online Groups. Atwood, Madison. League for Innovation in the Community College. (1999). Teaching At A Distance. Palloff, K. & Pratt, K. (2003). The Virtual Student: A Profile and Guide to Working With Online Learners. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco. Small, M. & Lohrasbi, A. (2003). Student Perspectives on Online Degrees and Courses: An Empirical Analysis. International Journal on E-Learning. 2(2), 15-28. Taniguchi, M. (2003). Introduction: Technology: Taking the Distance Out of Learning. Internet Metaphors Matter. Wiley, San Francisco. Watts, M. (2003). Introduction: Technology: Taking the Distance Out of Learning. Technology as Catalyst. Wiley, San Francisco. |
||
|
|||